Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Marginal Gains's avatar

I agree that technology can get there over time, even if it is not there today. I am not a doctor so I could be completely wrong. The doctors do a pattern matching and apply if symptom one and symptom two, then disease one and AI will have much more knowledge than a single doctor in most scenarios. In the scenario where there is not a lot of data, a human doctor will have an edge, or in cases where AI does not give importance to a symptom, a human doctor’s experience tells him otherwise. However, we need to address ethical and other questions. I am just listing a few:

How would we handle a medical error situation? Would we still blame the doctor or AI? Are most doctors not going to start trusting AI over their judgment because they would think AI has more knowledge than them?

A great example comes from Kasparov playing against Deep Blue:

“He later said he was again riled by a move the computer made that was so surprising, so un-machine-like, that he was sure the IBM team had cheated. What it may have been, in fact, was a glitch in Deep Blue’s programming: Faced with too many options and no clear preference, the computer chose a move at random. According to Wired, the move that threw Kasparov off his game and changed the momentum of the match was not a feature, but a bug.”

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts